Hurd v. Brown

Illinois Supreme Court

Hurd v. Brown

41 Ill. 125

CourtIllinois Supreme Court

DecidedApril 15, 1866

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 41 Ill. 125 (Hurd v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hurd v. Brown, 41 Ill. 125 (Ill. 1866).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Lawrence :

The same question in regard to the admissibility of witnesses is presented in this case as in the preceding case of Brown v. Hurd, decided at the present term of the court. The same facts are presented by this record, the parties being reversed. We held, in that case, that the parties who had been defaulted were not competent witnesses to charge the defendant as a copartner.

We so hold in this case. The judgment is reversed and the cause, remanded.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Lawrence :

The same question in regard to the admissibility of witnesses is presented in this case as in the preceding case of Brown v. Hurd, decided at the present term of the court. The same facts are presented by this record, the parties being reversed. We held, in that case, that the parties who had been defaulted were not competent witnesses to charge the defendant as a copartner.

We so hold in this case. The judgment is reversed and the cause, remanded.

Judgment reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

41 Ill. 125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hurd-v-brown-ill-1866.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack