Hurd v. Barber

1 Brayt. 170
Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided July 1, 1817·No. No. 9·Published

Opinion

COURT will not, in all cases, refuse to grant a new trial, where the cause stated, is the discovery of new and important testimony, although it is to a point litigated at the trial. The case must, however, be a strong one, to induce the Court to interfere.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hurd v. Barber, 1 Brayt. 170 (Vt. 1817).

1 Brayt. 170 (Hurd v. Barber) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.