Hurd ex rel. Davis v. Ball
148 N.E.2d 194, 237 Ind. 665, 1957 Ind. LEXIS 302
Opinion
Upon examination of appellant’s petition to transfer, we find no cause to grant the petition. However, “Denial of a petition to transfer does not indicate our approval of all language of the opinion under consideration.” Fardy v. Mayerstein (1943), 221 Ind. 339, 347, 47 N. E. 2d 315. We believe the essential reasoning of the opinion is correct and a transfer would not bring a different result.
Transfer denied.
Note. — Reported in 148 N. E. 2d 194.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hurd ex rel. Davis v. Ball, 148 N.E.2d 194, 237 Ind. 665, 1957 Ind. LEXIS 302 (Ind. 1957).
148 N.E.2d 194 (Hurd ex rel. Davis v. Ball) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Nestor v. Kapetanovic
573 N.E.2d 457 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1991)
Hurd Etc. v. Ball
143 N.E.2d 458 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1957)