Huppenbauer v. Durbin

23 La. Ann. 739
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedNovember 15, 1871
DocketNo. 3336
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 23 La. Ann. 739 (Huppenbauer v. Durbin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Huppenbauer v. Durbin, 23 La. Ann. 739 (La. 1871).

Opinion

Ludelixg, C. J.

A motion to dismiss the appeal has been made on the following among other grounds, to wit: That the appeal was dismissed by the district judge because a sufficient bond had not been given.

The record shows that an order for a suspensive appeal was granted and the amount of a bond for same was fixed. A bond was executed, hut on a rule to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed and an execution issue, on account of the worthlessness ofThe security, the district judge adjudged the security not good, and dismissed tho appeal. We must dismiss the appeal for want of a bond.

It is therefore ordered that the appeal be dismissed, at appellant’s costs.

Rehearing refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carter v. Hollingsworth Realty Co.
8 La. App. 67 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 La. Ann. 739, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huppenbauer-v-durbin-la-1871.