Huppenbauer v. Durbin

23 La. Ann. 739
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided November 15, 1871·No. No. 3336·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Ludelixg, C. J.

A motion to dismiss the appeal has been made on the following among other grounds, to wit: That the appeal was dismissed by the district judge because a sufficient bond had not been given.

The record shows that an order for a suspensive appeal was granted and the amount of a bond for same was fixed. A bond was executed, hut on a rule to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed and an execution issue, on account of the worthlessness ofThe security, the district judge adjudged the security not good, and dismissed tho appeal. We must dismiss the appeal for want of a bond.

It is therefore ordered that the appeal be dismissed, at appellant’s costs.

Rehearing refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Huppenbauer v. Durbin, 23 La. Ann. 739 (La. 1871).

23 La. Ann. 739 (Huppenbauer v. Durbin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carter v. Hollingsworth Realty Co.
8 La. App. 67 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1928)