Huntsman v. GERRISH TOWNSHIP

Michigan Supreme Court

Huntsman v. GERRISH TOWNSHIP

718 N.W.2d 826, 476 Mich. 862

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedAugust 11, 2006

Docket130068

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 718 N.W.2d 826 (Huntsman v. GERRISH TOWNSHIP) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Huntsman v. GERRISH TOWNSHIP, 718 N.W.2d 826, 476 Mich. 862 (Mich. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

718 N.W.2d 826 (2006)

Kelly and Ronald HUNTSMAN, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
GERRISH TOWNSHIP, et al., Defendants, and
Philip Will, et al., Defendants-Appellants.

Docket No. 130068, COA No. 262216.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

August 11, 2006.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 6, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action. MCR 7.302(G)(1). The parties may file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order, but they should avoid *827 submitting a mere restatement of the arguments made in their application papers.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

718 N.W.2d 826 (2006)

Kelly and Ronald HUNTSMAN, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
GERRISH TOWNSHIP, et al., Defendants, and
Philip Will, et al., Defendants-Appellants.

Docket No. 130068, COA No. 262216.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

August 11, 2006.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 6, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action. MCR 7.302(G)(1). The parties may file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order, but they should avoid *827 submitting a mere restatement of the arguments made in their application papers.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

718 N.W.2d 826, 476 Mich. 862, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huntsman-v-gerrish-township-mich-2006.

Opinion

Kelly and Ronald HUNTSMAN, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. GERRISH TOWNSHIP, et al., Defendants, and Philip Will, et al., Defendants-Appellants.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Kelly and Ronald HUNTSMAN, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
GERRISH TOWNSHIP, et al., Defendants, and
Philip Will, et al., Defendants-Appellants.