Huntsman Corporation, Huntsman International LLC, Huntsman (Holdings) Netherlands B v. v. MacOmb County Employees' Retirement System and Firemen's Retirement System of St. Louis

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 17, 2022
Docket09-20-00139-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Huntsman Corporation, Huntsman International LLC, Huntsman (Holdings) Netherlands B v. v. MacOmb County Employees' Retirement System and Firemen's Retirement System of St. Louis (Huntsman Corporation, Huntsman International LLC, Huntsman (Holdings) Netherlands B v. v. MacOmb County Employees' Retirement System and Firemen's Retirement System of St. Louis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Huntsman Corporation, Huntsman International LLC, Huntsman (Holdings) Netherlands B v. v. MacOmb County Employees' Retirement System and Firemen's Retirement System of St. Louis, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-20-00139-CV __________________

HUNTSMAN CORPORATION, HUNTSMAN INTERNATIONAL LLC, HUNTSMAN (HOLDINGS) NETHERLANDS B.V., Appellants

V.

MACOMB COUNTY EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM AND FIREMEN’S RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF ST. LOUIS, Appellees

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 134th District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Cause No. DC-19-02030 __________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The Appellants, Huntsman Corporation, Huntsman International LLC, and

Huntsman (Holdings) Netherlands B.V., and the Appellees, Macomb County

Employees’ Retirement System and Firemen’s Retirement System of St. Louis, filed

a joint motion to dismiss this accelerated appeal with prejudice. 1 See Tex. R. App.

1 The Supreme Court transferred this accelerated appeal to this Court from the Dallas Court of Appeals through an administrative order of transfer. See Tex. Gov’t 1 P. 42.1(a). The parties agree to a dismissal with prejudice and that each party shall

bear its own fees and costs. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R.

App. P. 43.2(f).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on April 26, 2021 Opinion Delivered March 17, 2022

Before Golemon, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.

Code Ann. § 73.001; see also Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014(a)(12) (authorizing interlocutory appeal of an order denying motion to dismiss filed under Texas Citizens Participation Act, Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code section 27.003). 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 51.014
Texas CP § 51.014(a)(12)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Huntsman Corporation, Huntsman International LLC, Huntsman (Holdings) Netherlands B v. v. MacOmb County Employees' Retirement System and Firemen's Retirement System of St. Louis, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huntsman-corporation-huntsman-international-llc-huntsman-holdings-texapp-2022.