Huntsman Corporation, Huntsman International LLC, Huntsman (Holdings) Netherlands B v. v. MacOmb County Employees' Retirement System and Firemen's Retirement System of St. Louis
This text of Huntsman Corporation, Huntsman International LLC, Huntsman (Holdings) Netherlands B v. v. MacOmb County Employees' Retirement System and Firemen's Retirement System of St. Louis (Huntsman Corporation, Huntsman International LLC, Huntsman (Holdings) Netherlands B v. v. MacOmb County Employees' Retirement System and Firemen's Retirement System of St. Louis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
__________________
NO. 09-20-00139-CV __________________
HUNTSMAN CORPORATION, HUNTSMAN INTERNATIONAL LLC, HUNTSMAN (HOLDINGS) NETHERLANDS B.V., Appellants
V.
MACOMB COUNTY EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM AND FIREMEN’S RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF ST. LOUIS, Appellees
__________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 134th District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Cause No. DC-19-02030 __________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The Appellants, Huntsman Corporation, Huntsman International LLC, and
Huntsman (Holdings) Netherlands B.V., and the Appellees, Macomb County
Employees’ Retirement System and Firemen’s Retirement System of St. Louis, filed
a joint motion to dismiss this accelerated appeal with prejudice. 1 See Tex. R. App.
1 The Supreme Court transferred this accelerated appeal to this Court from the Dallas Court of Appeals through an administrative order of transfer. See Tex. Gov’t 1 P. 42.1(a). The parties agree to a dismissal with prejudice and that each party shall
bear its own fees and costs. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R.
App. P. 43.2(f).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM
Submitted on April 26, 2021 Opinion Delivered March 17, 2022
Before Golemon, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.
Code Ann. § 73.001; see also Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014(a)(12) (authorizing interlocutory appeal of an order denying motion to dismiss filed under Texas Citizens Participation Act, Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code section 27.003). 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Huntsman Corporation, Huntsman International LLC, Huntsman (Holdings) Netherlands B v. v. MacOmb County Employees' Retirement System and Firemen's Retirement System of St. Louis, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huntsman-corporation-huntsman-international-llc-huntsman-holdings-texapp-2022.