Hunts Point Terminal Produce Cooperative Ass'n v. New York City Business Integrity Commission

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hunts Point Terminal Produce Cooperative Ass'n v. New York City Business Integrity Commission

60 A.D.3d 597, 874 N.Y.S.2d 909

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 31, 2009

StatusPublished

This text of 60 A.D.3d 597 (Hunts Point Terminal Produce Cooperative Ass'n v. New York City Business Integrity Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hunts Point Terminal Produce Cooperative Ass'n v. New York City Business Integrity Commission, 60 A.D.3d 597, 874 N.Y.S.2d 909 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

— Order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lucy Billings, J.), entered December 3, 2007, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs and appellant’s letter of March 9, 2009, directed respondents New York City Business Integrity Commission (BIG) and Thomas McCormack, within 90 days after entry of the order, to initiate rulemaking of regulations establishing bonding and waste disposal requirements unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the direction vacated.

Since petitioner did not request that BIC and McCormack (BIC’s then-chair) initiate rulemaking, Supreme Court should not have granted that relief (Matter of Nozzleman 60, LLC v Village Bd. of Vil. of Cold Spring, 34 AD3d 680, 681 [2006], lv denied 9 NY3d 803 [2007]). Concur — Saxe, J.P., Buckley, McGuire, DeGrasse and Freedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lucy Billings, J.), entered December 3, 2007, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs and appellant’s letter of March 9, 2009, directed respondents New York City Business Integrity Commission (BIG) and Thomas McCormack, within 90 days after entry of the order, to initiate rulemaking of regulations establishing bonding and waste disposal requirements unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the direction vacated.

Since petitioner did not request that BIC and McCormack (BIC’s then-chair) initiate rulemaking, Supreme Court should not have granted that relief (Matter of Nozzleman 60, LLC v Village Bd. of Vil. of Cold Spring, 34 AD3d 680, 681 [2006], lv denied 9 NY3d 803 [2007]). Concur — Saxe, J.P., Buckley, McGuire, DeGrasse and Freedman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 A.D.3d 597, 874 N.Y.S.2d 909, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunts-point-terminal-produce-cooperative-assn-v-new-york-city-business-nyappdiv-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack