Huntley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Huntley v. State

493 So. 2d 58, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1822, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9488

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 20, 1986

DocketNo. BJ-457

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 493 So. 2d 58 (Huntley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Huntley v. State, 493 So. 2d 58, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1822, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9488 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on appeal from a summary denial of appellant’s motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. The trial court did not conduct an evidentia-ry hearing and failed to attach portions of the record which “conclusively show that the prisoner is entitled to no relief.” In such instances, Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, now requires the trial court to “order the State Attorney to file an answer or other pleading within the period of time fixed by the court or to take such other action as the judge deems appropriate.”

Accordingly, we must reverse and remand to the trial court to proceed in accordance with the rule.

BOOTH, C.J., and ERVIN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on appeal from a summary denial of appellant’s motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. The trial court did not conduct an evidentia-ry hearing and failed to attach portions of the record which “conclusively show that the prisoner is entitled to no relief.” In such instances, Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, now requires the trial court to “order the State Attorney to file an answer or other pleading within the period of time fixed by the court or to take such other action as the judge deems appropriate.”

Accordingly, we must reverse and remand to the trial court to proceed in accordance with the rule.

BOOTH, C.J., and ERVIN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

493 So. 2d 58, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1822, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9488, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huntley-v-state-fladistctapp-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack