Huntley v. Bank of Winona
69 Miss. 663
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
The tax in controversy in this case is confessedly in excess of the limitation prescribed by the act of 1890 (Laws, p. 9). It is certainly a tax levied by the municipal authorities of the town of Winona, and, being such, it is forbidden by law, regardless of the purposes for which it was levied.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Huntley v. Bank of Winona, 69 Miss. 663 (Mich. 1892).
69 Miss. 663 (Huntley v. Bank of Winona) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re Steen
134 So. 67 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1931)
City of Jackson v. Deposit Guaranty Bank & Trust Co.
133 So. 195 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1931)
Garrett v. Robertson
83 So. 177 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1919)
Adams v. Bank of Oxford
78 Miss. 532 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1900)
Adams v. Mississippi State Bank
75 Miss. 701 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1898)