Huntington v. Walker

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Huntington v. Walker

9 D.C. 479

CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 15, 1876

DocketNo. 1692

StatusPublished

This text of 9 D.C. 479 (Huntington v. Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Huntington v. Walker, 9 D.C. 479 (D.C. 1876).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court :

We think that when a sale of property is ordered by the •court, and the sale takes place in pursuance of an advertisement such as- was published in the present case, the notes for deferred payment should be dated on the day the propertv was struck off to the purchaser, and should bear interest from such time. We also think that the purchaser is entitled to the rents of the premises if they are occupied by a tenant intermediate the sale and confirmation. The trustee must therefore credit the purchaser with the amount of any rents he may have collected in the mean time.

Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court :

We think that when a sale of property is ordered by the •court, and the sale takes place in pursuance of an advertisement such as- was published in the present case, the notes for deferred payment should be dated on the day the propertv was struck off to the purchaser, and should bear interest from such time. We also think that the purchaser is entitled to the rents of the premises if they are occupied by a tenant intermediate the sale and confirmation. The trustee must therefore credit the purchaser with the amount of any rents he may have collected in the mean time.

Ordered accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 D.C. 479, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huntington-v-walker-dc-1876.