Huntington v. Todd

3 Day 465
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided June 15, 1809·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

By the Court,

The court cannot consider the promise laid in the declaration as dependent on implication of law, but it may be considered as an express, oi even a written contract. If the consideration is sufficient to support an express written contract, the declaration is good. The plaintiff alleges the payment of money, which he became liable, to pay on account of the defendant, and which it was the proper debt and duty of the defendant to pay. This is a good consideration for an express promise.

Judgment reversed.

j£"P The court ordered the cause to be remanded to the superior court, and the rule of damages to be the costs paid in the two courts below, exclusive, however, of officers* fees upon the executions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Huntington v. Todd, 3 Day 465 (Colo. 1809).

3 Day 465 (Huntington v. Todd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Taylor v. Baldwin
10 Barb. 626 (New York Supreme Court, 1851)