Huntington v. Todd

3 Day 465
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedJune 15, 1809
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 3 Day 465 (Huntington v. Todd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Huntington v. Todd, 3 Day 465 (Colo. 1809).

Opinion

By the Court,

The court cannot consider the promise laid in the declaration as dependent on implication of law, but it may be considered as an express, oi even a written contract. If the consideration is sufficient to support an express written contract, the declaration is good. The plaintiff alleges the payment of money, which he became liable, to pay on account of the defendant, and which it was the proper debt and duty of the defendant to pay. This is a good consideration for an express promise.

Judgment reversed.

j£"P The court ordered the cause to be remanded to the superior court, and the rule of damages to be the costs paid in the two courts below, exclusive, however, of officers* fees upon the executions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Taylor v. Baldwin
10 Barb. 626 (New York Supreme Court, 1851)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Day 465, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huntington-v-todd-conn-1809.