Huntington v. Todd
This text of 3 Day 465 (Huntington v. Todd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The court cannot consider the promise laid in the declaration as dependent on implication of law, but it may be considered as an express, oi even a written contract. If the consideration is sufficient to support an express written contract, the declaration is good. The plaintiff alleges the payment of money, which he became liable, to pay on account of the defendant, and which it was the proper debt and duty of the defendant to pay. This is a good consideration for an express promise.
Judgment reversed.
j£"P The court ordered the cause to be remanded to the superior court, and the rule of damages to be the costs paid in the two courts below, exclusive, however, of officers* fees upon the executions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 Day 465, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huntington-v-todd-conn-1809.