Huntington v. Ripley

1 Root 321
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedSeptember 15, 1791
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 1 Root 321 (Huntington v. Ripley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Huntington v. Ripley, 1 Root 321 (Colo. 1791).

Opinion

Judgment of this court — That there is nothing erroneous in the judgment complained of. The vote of said society in A. D. 1764, was a sufficient authority to> the committee to make the rate. The issue is a material issue, and the jury have found it substantially in favor of the defendants; every reasonable construction is to be made in support of a verdict. Adopting this rule the supposed repugnancy will vanish and the verdict will read thus; the jury find that there is no such separate church or society existing, etc. to which he has adhered, and hath contributed his proportion, etc. ' Which directly negates the facts affirmed by the plaintiff in, his .reply, and traversed by the defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Whitaker v. Tatem
48 Conn. 520 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1881)
Wood v. Milly McGuire's Children
17 Ga. 361 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1855)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Root 321, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huntington-v-ripley-conn-1791.