Huntington v. Jones

Connecticut Superior Court

Huntington v. Jones

1 Kirby 33

DecidedMarch 15, 1786

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Kirby 33 (Huntington v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Huntington v. Jones, 1 Kirby 33 (Colo. Ct. App. 1786).

Pincite

Opinion

By the whole Court.

The binding here is not only to the person named, but also to his heirs and assigns: Whereas, by the statute, the right of service is personal, and extends only to the master named and approved by the court, who are to regard as well the condition and character of the person to whom the assignment is made, as of the person assigned. The provision of law for assigning debtors in service being an abridgment of personal liberty, requires caution in exercise, and is not to be enlarged by implication.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the whole Court.

The binding here is not only to the person named, but also to his heirs and assigns: Whereas, by the statute, the right of service is personal, and extends only to the master named and approved by the court, who are to regard as well the condition and character of the person to whom the assignment is made, as of the person assigned. The provision of law for assigning debtors in service being an abridgment of personal liberty, requires caution in exercise, and is not to be enlarged by implication.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Kirby 33, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huntington-v-jones-connsuperct-1786.