Huntington Mining Holdings, Inc. v. Cottontail Plaza, Inc.

96 A.D.2d 526, 465 N.Y.S.2d 40, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19046
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 11, 1983
StatusPublished
Cited by24 cases

This text of 96 A.D.2d 526 (Huntington Mining Holdings, Inc. v. Cottontail Plaza, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Huntington Mining Holdings, Inc. v. Cottontail Plaza, Inc., 96 A.D.2d 526, 465 N.Y.S.2d 40, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19046 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Opinion

— In an action, inter alia, for specific performance of a contract to sell real property, defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Geiler, J.), entered December 30,1982, which, upon a stipulation of facts and submission of deposition testimony, granted specific performance to the plaintiff. Judgment reversed, on the law and the facts, with costs and complaint dismissed. Defendant acted unilaterally in canceling the subject contract, and plaintiff was thereby excused from its duty to tender its own performance (see Glauber v P. S. F. B. Assoc., 89 AD2d 576; Stawski v Epstein, 67 AD2d 681). However, plaintiff bore the burden of showing that it was ready, willing, and able to perform its own obligations under the contract in order to obtain the relief of specific performance (Stawski v Epstein, supra; Friederang v Aldo Co., 199 App Div 127,129; Spuches v Royal View, 23 Mise 2d 878, revd on other grounds 13 AD2d 815). Plaintiff’s president testified at his deposition that during the year in question the plaintiff corporation never had more than $65 in its bank account. He further testified that plaintiff expected to obtain [527]*527financing of the $4,300,000 purchase price from one Sam Albicocco. However, Albicocco testified that he was never approached by plaintiff for financing of the transaction until approximately 11 months after the law day. Plaintiff failed to produce any written commitments for financing from a financial institution or other evidence to show that it could have tendered the purchase price on the law day. Since plaintiff failed to prove that it was financially able to purchase the subject property, Special Term erred in granting it the relief of specific performance. Mangano, J. P., O’Connor, Bracken and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kabro PM, LLC v. WGB Main Street, LLC
52 A.D.3d 659 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Sau Ting Cheng v. Prime Design Realty, Inc.
44 A.D.3d 644 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Greenberg v. Joffee
34 A.D.3d 426 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Aliperti v. Laurel Links, Ltd.
27 A.D.3d 675 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
28 Properties, Inc. v. Akleh Realty Corp.
309 A.D.2d 632 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Petrelli Associates, Inc. v. Germano
268 A.D.2d 513 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Elbayadi v. Norton
216 A.D.2d 936 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Handy v. Manganelli
181 A.D.2d 658 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Madison Investments, Inc. v. Cohoes Associates
176 A.D.2d 1021 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
3M Holding Corp. v. Wagner
166 A.D.2d 580 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Petrizzo v. Pinks
154 A.D.2d 521 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Frangos v. Paskowski
143 A.D.2d 879 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
L.I.C. Commercial Corp. v. Zirinsky
142 A.D.2d 713 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Murray v. Armour
139 A.D.2d 708 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Zev v. Merman
134 A.D.2d 555 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Wilson v. City of Long Beach
133 A.D.2d 684 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Kramer v. Brown
131 A.D.2d 816 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Lee v. Caric
125 A.D.2d 453 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Mazzaferro v. Kings Park Butcher Shop, Inc.
121 A.D.2d 434 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
96 A.D.2d 526, 465 N.Y.S.2d 40, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19046, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huntington-mining-holdings-inc-v-cottontail-plaza-inc-nyappdiv-1983.