Hunting v. Ward

55 N.E. 1042, 175 Mass. 223, 1900 Mass. LEXIS 739
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided January 16, 1900·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

The plaintiff’s evidence warranted a finding that the defendant reasonably was understood to contract in his private capacity. Whether it warranted any other it is not necessary to consider. See Durkin v. Langley, 167 Mass. 577, 578.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hunting v. Ward, 55 N.E. 1042, 175 Mass. 223, 1900 Mass. LEXIS 739 (Mass. 1900).

55 N.E. 1042 (Hunting v. Ward) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sweeney v. Agnes
6 Mass. App. Dec. 117 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1954)
Carton v. Shea
45 N.E.2d 826 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1942)
Joseph S. Waterman & Sons, Inc. v. Hook
246 Mass. 522 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1923)