Hunter v. United States

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Hunter v. United States

126 F. 894, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 5213

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided December 17, 1903·No. No. 3,145·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PFATT, District Judge.

The merchandise in question was assessed for duty as a manufacture of paper at 35 per cent, ad valorem, under paragraph 407, Tariff Act July 24, 1897, c. 11, § 1, Schedule M, 30 Stat. 189 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1673], and is claimed by the importer to be dutiable at 20 per cent, ad valorem, as “paper envelopes, plain,” under paragraph 399 of said act, c. 11, § 1, Schedule M, 30 Stat. 188 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1672]. The findings of the Board of General Appraisers are approved, and their decision sustaining the assessment of duty by the collector is affirmed on the authority of In re Blumenthal, 4 C. C. A. 680, affirming (C. C.) 51 Fed. 76.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PFATT, District Judge.

The merchandise in question was assessed for duty as a manufacture of paper at 35 per cent, ad valorem, under paragraph 407, Tariff Act July 24, 1897, c. 11, § 1, Schedule M, 30 Stat. 189 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1673], and is claimed by the importer to be dutiable at 20 per cent, ad valorem, as “paper envelopes, plain,” under paragraph 399 of said act, c. 11, § 1, Schedule M, 30 Stat. 188 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1672]. The findings of the Board of General Appraisers are approved, and their decision sustaining the assessment of duty by the collector is affirmed on the authority of In re Blumenthal, 4 C. C. A. 680, affirming (C. C.) 51 Fed. 76.

Hunter v. United States, 126 F. 894, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 5213 (circtsdny 1903).

Pincite

126 F. 894 (Hunter v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related