Hunter v. United States

219 F.2d 69
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided February 3, 1955·No. No. 132, Docket 23125·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

FRANK, Circuit Judge.

Taxpayer contends that the attorney’s fees are deductible under Section 23(a) (2) of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C.A. § 23(a) (2), as “ordinary and necessary expenses * * * for the production * * * of income * * He argues that, as the settlement reduced the amount of his liability for alimony and thus increased his taxable net income, it constituted the “production of income.” We cannot agree. We think the “production” of income means the creation of increased gross income, not a reduction of liabilities or an increase of net taxable income by a reduction of allowable deductions in computing net income. Lykes. v. United States, 343 U.S. 118, 72 S.Ct. 585, 96 L.Ed. 791; Howard v. Commissioner, 9 Cir., 202 F.2d 28.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hunter v. United States, 219 F.2d 69 (2d Cir. 1955).

219 F.2d 69 (Hunter v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. Commissioner
1980 T.C. Memo. 182 (U.S. Tax Court, 1980)
Joseph Lewis v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
253 F.2d 821 (Second Circuit, 1958)
R. Fenley Hunter v. United States
219 F.2d 69 (Second Circuit, 1955)