Hunter v. Staten

103 S.E. 719, 25 Ga. App. 389, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 823
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 15, 1920
Docket11426
StatusPublished

This text of 103 S.E. 719 (Hunter v. Staten) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hunter v. Staten, 103 S.E. 719, 25 Ga. App. 389, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 823 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and none of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial shows cause for a reversal of the judgment below.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. Trover; from city court of Valdosta—Judge Cranford. March 5, 1920. F. S. Harrell, for plaintiff in error. Dan R. Bruce, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 S.E. 719, 25 Ga. App. 389, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 823, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunter-v-staten-gactapp-1920.