Hunter v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Hunter v. State

176 S.E. 911, 50 Ga. App. 113, 1934 Ga. App. LEXIS 645

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 7, 1934

Docket24191

StatusPublished

This text of 176 S.E. 911 (Hunter v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hunter v. State, 176 S.E. 911, 50 Ga. App. 113, 1934 Ga. App. LEXIS 645 (Ga. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

MacIntyre, J.

1. Considering the answer of the trial judge in connection with the brief of evidence attached to the petition for certiorari, the evidence authorized the verdict.

2. The evidence authorized the charge of the judge to the jury upon the law of flight.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Guerry, J., concur. . C. G. Battle, for plaintiff in error. John A. Boylcin, solicitor-general, John 8. McClella/nd, solicitor, J. W. LeOraw, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MacIntyre, J.

1. Considering the answer of the trial judge in connection with the brief of evidence attached to the petition for certiorari, the evidence authorized the verdict.

2. The evidence authorized the charge of the judge to the jury upon the law of flight.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Guerry, J., concur. . C. G. Battle, for plaintiff in error. John A. Boylcin, solicitor-general, John 8. McClella/nd, solicitor, J. W. LeOraw, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

176 S.E. 911, 50 Ga. App. 113, 1934 Ga. App. LEXIS 645, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunter-v-state-gactapp-1934.