Hunter v. State

79 S.E. 752, 13 Ga. App. 651, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 292
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided October 28, 1913·No. 5085·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Russell, J.

This case is controlled by the rulings of this court in Paulk v. State, 5 Ga. App. 572 (63 S. E. 659), Moses v. State, 8 Ga. App. 446 (69 S. E. 575), and Smith v. State, 11 Ga. App. 385 (75 S. E. 447). From the state of the evidence in the record, it was the duty of the court (without a request) to instruct the jury that if the intention to steal was not formed until after the killing of the cow, the defendants would not be guilty of the offense of cattle-stealing, and could not be convicted under the indictment. It was error to charge the jury, in effect, that although the killing was accidental, if the defendants thereafter formed the intention of converting the carcass to their own use they would be guilty. Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hunter v. State, 79 S.E. 752, 13 Ga. App. 651, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 292 (Ga. Ct. App. 1913).

79 S.E. 752 (Hunter v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rhodes v. State
218 S.E.2d 159 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1975)