Hunter v. State
This text of 563 So. 2d 215 (Hunter v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case is before us on remand from the supreme court, 560 So.2d 233, with directions that we reconsider our decision of November 12, 1987, in light of the holding in Bostick v. State, 554 So.2d 1153 (Fla.1989).
Upon reconsideration we conclude that the trial court erred, under the law announced in Bostick, in denying the appellant’s motion to suppress. In accordance with Bostick, we withdraw our decision of November 12, 1987, reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand for further proceedings consistent with Bostick.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
563 So. 2d 215, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4761, 1990 WL 91899, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunter-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.