Hunter v. State

563 So. 2d 215, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4761, 1990 WL 91899
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 5, 1990
DocketNo. 4-86-1312
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 563 So. 2d 215 (Hunter v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hunter v. State, 563 So. 2d 215, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4761, 1990 WL 91899 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case is before us on remand from the supreme court, 560 So.2d 233, with directions that we reconsider our decision of November 12, 1987, in light of the holding in Bostick v. State, 554 So.2d 1153 (Fla.1989).

Upon reconsideration we conclude that the trial court erred, under the law announced in Bostick, in denying the appellant’s motion to suppress. In accordance with Bostick, we withdraw our decision of November 12, 1987, reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand for further proceedings consistent with Bostick.

ANSTEAD and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., and GOLDMAN, MURRAY, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Hunter
596 So. 2d 158 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
563 So. 2d 215, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4761, 1990 WL 91899, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunter-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.