Hunter v. State

357 So. 2d 778, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15775
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hunter v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 314 So. 2d 174
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 25, 1978·No. No. HH-391·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was sentenced to sixty (60) days for attempted petit larceny and five (5) years to run concurrently for burglary of a structure. Further the sentence provided that the appellant pay costs of $2 or serve one (1) day of confinement to run concurrently with the sentence. Since the appellant had been found insolvent, the requirement that he pay costs or serve one day of confinement was error. Smith v. State, 352 So.2d 1276 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). Judgment and sentence are affirmed except for the assessment of costs and the one day sentence in lieu thereof and the cause is remanded with directions to delete same from the sentence. Such modification may be made without pronouncement in open court and without the necessity of appellant being present.

McCORD, C. J., and BOYER and MELVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hunter v. State, 357 So. 2d 778, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15775 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

357 So. 2d 778 (Hunter v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. State
352 So. 2d 1276 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)