Hunter v. State

47 So. 133, 156 Ala. 20, 1908 Ala. LEXIS 55
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJune 11, 1908
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 47 So. 133 (Hunter v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hunter v. State, 47 So. 133, 156 Ala. 20, 1908 Ala. LEXIS 55 (Ala. 1908).

Opinion

ANDEBSON, J.

The trial court did not err in refusing to quash the venire or in putting the defendant on trial upon same. The second copy served on the defendant was in time, and contained a list of the jurors drawn and summoned as provided by law.

There was no error in the oral charge of the court excepted to, as the state had the right to show murder, whether under section 7084 or section 7086 of the Code of 1907. The defendant was indicted for murder in the first , degree, and a conviction could be properly had thereunder for any lower degree of the offense, notwithstanding a separate form may be prescribed under section 7086, Code 1907. — Scales v. State, 96 Ala. 75, 11 South. 121.

The trial court committed no reversible error in ruling upon the evidence, or in refusing the general charge requested by the defendant.

The judgment of the city court is affirmed.

Tyson, C. J., and Simpson and Denson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Borden v. State
337 So. 2d 1388 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1976)
Houlton v. State
48 So. 2d 7 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1950)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
47 So. 133, 156 Ala. 20, 1908 Ala. LEXIS 55, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunter-v-state-ala-1908.