Hunter v. Schuyler

1 How. Pr. 96
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 15, 1845
StatusPublished

This text of 1 How. Pr. 96 (Hunter v. Schuyler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hunter v. Schuyler, 1 How. Pr. 96 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1845).

Opinion

Nelson, Chief Justice.

The circumstances are very strong against the defendant; he received the money as a public officer, and is not entitled to any equity from the court. It is a matter of discretion with the court entirely, and taking all the circumstances of this case into consideration, the motion must be denied with costs.

Rule accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 How. Pr. 96, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunter-v-schuyler-nysupct-1845.