Hunter v. Ramsay
170 A.D. 950, 155 N.Y.S. 1114, 1915 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5478
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hunter v. Ramsay. Read the opinion of the Court — 168 A.D. 953 →
Opinion
Order modified (1) by striking out paragraph thereof marked second and substi[951]*951tuting a direction striking out paragraphs marked third, ninth and tenth of the complaint; (2) by striking out so much of paragraph fourth of the complaint as reads: “in violation of said understanding and agreement and.” As thus modified the order is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Carr, Stapleton, Mills and Putnam, JJ., concurred. Order to be settled on two days’ notice before Mr. Justice Stapleton.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hunter v. Ramsay, 170 A.D. 950, 155 N.Y.S. 1114, 1915 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5478 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).
170 A.D. 950 (Hunter v. Ramsay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.