Hunter v. New York Inter-Urban Water Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hunter v. New York Inter-Urban Water Co.

157 A.D. 938, 142 N.Y.S. 1123

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1913

StatusPublished

This text of 157 A.D. 938 (Hunter v. New York Inter-Urban Water Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hunter v. New York Inter-Urban Water Co., 157 A.D. 938, 142 N.Y.S. 1123 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Order modified to the extent that the temporary injunction against the defendant shall be confined simply to the cutting off of the water supply of plaintiff and those similarly situated, pending the trial of the action, provided payment is made for said water supply at the rates in force on December 31, 1912, and all reasonable regulations of the defendant have been complied with. If plaintiff neglects to bring this action on for trial at the June Special Term for Trials in Westchester, then the defendant may apply at Special Term for the vacation of the injunction order or the giving of such further security by the plaintiff as it may feel advised. Jenks, P. J., Carr, Rich, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred. Order to be settled before Mr. Justice Carr.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order modified to the extent that the temporary injunction against the defendant shall be confined simply to the cutting off of the water supply of plaintiff and those similarly situated, pending the trial of the action, provided payment is made for said water supply at the rates in force on December 31, 1912, and all reasonable regulations of the defendant have been complied with. If plaintiff neglects to bring this action on for trial at the June Special Term for Trials in Westchester, then the defendant may apply at Special Term for the vacation of the injunction order or the giving of such further security by the plaintiff as it may feel advised. Jenks, P. J., Carr, Rich, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred. Order to be settled before Mr. Justice Carr.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

157 A.D. 938, 142 N.Y.S. 1123, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunter-v-new-york-inter-urban-water-co-nyappdiv-1913.