Hunter v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hunter v. New York City Transit Authority

107 A.D.2d 590, 484 N.Y.S.2d 1010, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42588

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 8, 1985

StatusPublished

This text of 107 A.D.2d 590 (Hunter v. New York City Transit Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hunter v. New York City Transit Authority, 107 A.D.2d 590, 484 N.Y.S.2d 1010, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42588 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert E. Fischer, J.), entered on January 4, 1984, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs and without disbursements, and a new trial ordered solely on the issue of damages, unless the plaintiff, within 20 days after service upon her attorney of a copy of the order to be entered herein, with notice of entry, serves and files in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict in her favor to $200,000 and to the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith. If plaintiff so stipulates, the judgment, as so amended and reduced, is affirmed, without costs and without disbursements.

After review of the record, the damages appear to us to be excessive to the extent indicated. Concur — Asch, J. P., Bloom, Fein and Kassal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert E. Fischer, J.), entered on January 4, 1984, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs and without disbursements, and a new trial ordered solely on the issue of damages, unless the plaintiff, within 20 days after service upon her attorney of a copy of the order to be entered herein, with notice of entry, serves and files in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict in her favor to $200,000 and to the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith. If plaintiff so stipulates, the judgment, as so amended and reduced, is affirmed, without costs and without disbursements.

After review of the record, the damages appear to us to be excessive to the extent indicated. Concur — Asch, J. P., Bloom, Fein and Kassal.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

107 A.D.2d 590, 484 N.Y.S.2d 1010, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42588, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunter-v-new-york-city-transit-authority-nyappdiv-1985.