Hunter v. Miller
This text of 11 Ind. 356 (Hunter v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This was an application for the partition of certain real estate.
The Court, under the 9th section of the statute on the subject of partition, awarded an interlocutory judgment that partition be made, &c., and appointed commissioners to make partition according to the terms of such order, &c.
From this interlocutory judgment, an appeal is now attempted to be prosecuted.
The statute permitting appeals from interlocutory orders, does not embrace within its provisions this case. 2 R. S. p. 162, § 576.
The appeal is dismissed with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 Ind. 356, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunter-v-miller-ind-1858.