Hunter v. Miller

11 Ind. 356
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 15, 1858
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 11 Ind. 356 (Hunter v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hunter v. Miller, 11 Ind. 356 (Ind. 1858).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This was an application for the partition of certain real estate.

The Court, under the 9th section of the statute on the subject of partition, awarded an interlocutory judgment that partition be made, &c., and appointed commissioners to make partition according to the terms of such order, &c.

B. F. Gregory, J. Harper, I Naylor, and J. Wilson, for the appellants. J. R. M. Bryant and R. A. Chandler, for the appellees.

From this interlocutory judgment, an appeal is now attempted to be prosecuted.

The statute permitting appeals from interlocutory orders, does not embrace within its provisions this case. 2 R. S. p. 162, § 576.

The appeal is dismissed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Skallberg v. Skallberg
121 N.W. 979 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1909)
Camp Phosphate Co. v. Anderson
48 Fla. 226 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1904)
Hunter v. Miller
17 Ind. 88 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1861)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 Ind. 356, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunter-v-miller-ind-1858.