Hunter v. McClung Realty Co.

185 S.E. 461, 210 N.C. 91, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 25
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedApril 29, 1936
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 185 S.E. 461 (Hunter v. McClung Realty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hunter v. McClung Realty Co., 185 S.E. 461, 210 N.C. 91, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 25 (N.C. 1936).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

There was no evidence at the trial of this action tending to show that the payees of the notes sued on received from the defendants interest at a rate in excess of six per centum per annum, or that they charged the defendants interest on said notes at such rate, and thereby became liable for the statutory penalties for usury. C. S., 2306.

All the evidence showed that the sum of $217.50 was paid by the defendants to the Independence Trust Company, and that said sum was not paid to or received by the executors of R. N. Hunter, deceased, to whom the notes are payable.

For that reason, there was no error in the refusal of the court to submit to the jury the issue tendered by the defendants, or in the peremptory charge of the court to the jury on the issue submitted by the court.

The judgment is affirmed.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Insurance Co. v. . Smathers
192 S.E. 851 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1937)
Life Insurance Co. of Virginia v. Smathers
212 N.C. 40 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
185 S.E. 461, 210 N.C. 91, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 25, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunter-v-mcclung-realty-co-nc-1936.