Hunter v. Mahaffey

86 S.E. 538, 144 Ga. 185, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 114
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedOctober 13, 1915
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 86 S.E. 538 (Hunter v. Mahaffey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hunter v. Mahaffey, 86 S.E. 538, 144 Ga. 185, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 114 (Ga. 1915).

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

1. The charge complained of in the fifth special ground of the motion for new trial was authorized by the evidence.

2. Mere omission to charge, without request, as to the burden of proof and preponderance of evidence will not require a new trial. Small v. Williams, 87 Ga. 681 (13 S. E. 589).

3. One of the special grounds of the motion for new trial not covered by the following rulings was not approved by the trial judge. The others were not referred to in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error.

4. The evidence was sufficient to authorize the verdict, and there was no error in refusing a new trial. •

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Knapp Bros. Manufacturing Co. v. Cook
155 S.E. 321 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1930)
Trammell v. Shirley
145 S.E. 486 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
86 S.E. 538, 144 Ga. 185, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 114, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunter-v-mahaffey-ga-1915.