Hunter v. Ledoux

834 So. 2d 974, 2002 La. LEXIS 3355, 2002 WL 31628397
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedNovember 22, 2002
DocketNo. 2002-C-2193
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 834 So. 2d 974 (Hunter v. Ledoux) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hunter v. Ledoux, 834 So. 2d 974, 2002 La. LEXIS 3355, 2002 WL 31628397 (La. 2002).

Opinions

| VICTORY, J.,

dissenting.

Granted. Any discrepancy by the jury polling was, under the facts of this case, harmless error. Because the general verdict and the answers to the jury interrogatories were harmonious, the trial court was required to direct entry of an appropriate judgment based upon the verdict and interrogatory answers. See La. C.C.P. art. 1813(C). Accordingly, the judgments of the trial court and the Court of Appeal are reversed. This case is remanded to the district court for the entry of judgment in accordance with the jury verdict as reflected on the jury verdict form, reserving to the parties all post judgment proceedings.

VICTORY, J., dissents and assigns reasons.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Wright
834 So. 2d 974 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
834 So. 2d 974, 2002 La. LEXIS 3355, 2002 WL 31628397, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunter-v-ledoux-la-2002.