Hunter v. Hunter

Missouri Court of Appeals

Hunter v. Hunter

200 S.W.3d 561, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1321, 2006 WL 2529520

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 5, 2006·No. ED 86925·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

David Alan Hunter appeals from the judgment and amended judgment of the trial court dissolving his marriage to Cheryl A. Hunter. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in its award of maintenance or its division of marital property. Halupa v. Halupa, 943 S.W.2d 272, 277 (Mo.App. E.D.1997). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

David Alan Hunter appeals from the judgment and amended judgment of the trial court dissolving his marriage to Cheryl A. Hunter. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in its award of maintenance or its division of marital property. Halupa v. Halupa, 943 S.W.2d 272, 277 (Mo.App. E.D.1997). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Hunter v. Hunter, 200 S.W.3d 561, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1321, 2006 WL 2529520 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

200 S.W.3d 561 (Hunter v. Hunter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related