Hunter v. Hunter
This text of 200 S.W.3d 561 (Hunter v. Hunter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
David Alan Hunter appeals from the judgment and amended judgment of the trial court dissolving his marriage to Cheryl A. Hunter. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in its award of maintenance or its division of marital property. Halupa v. Halupa, 943 S.W.2d 272, 277 (Mo.App. E.D.1997). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
200 S.W.3d 561, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1321, 2006 WL 2529520, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunter-v-hunter-moctapp-2006.