Hunter v. Hunter

249 S.E.2d 564, 242 Ga. 94, 1978 Ga. LEXIS 1107
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 7, 1978
Docket33600
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 249 S.E.2d 564 (Hunter v. Hunter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hunter v. Hunter, 249 S.E.2d 564, 242 Ga. 94, 1978 Ga. LEXIS 1107 (Ga. 1978).

Opinion

Hill, Justice.

In this no-fault divorce case the wife appeals from a judgment awarding alimony based upon a jury verdict. She complains that the alimony awarded was too low and that the court erred in admitting certain testimony.

The wife, 60 years old, earns approximately $90 per week when working. The husband, 75, receives $200 per month from Social Security. The jury awarded the wife $100 per month alimony until she reaches age 65 or remarries. The wife seeks to set this award aside on the general grounds that the alimony award is contrary to the evidence and insufficient as a matter of law. We find that the award is supported by the evidence. Williams v. Williams, 241 Ga. 32 (243 SE2d 69) (1978); Thornhill v. Thornhill, 237 Ga. 900 (230 SE2d 284) (1976).

The wife’s other enumeration of error complains of the admission of certain testimony as to her conduct with another man some years before this divorce action. The husband asserted that her conduct caused him to move to a separate room, had a continuing effect on their relationship, and caused the eventual separation. A spouse who alleges that the marriage is irretrievably broken is not estopped from showing the conduct which caused it to be irretrievably broken. Such specific showing is not contrary to the general allegation. See Code § 30-201. Although it is undisputed that the conduct testified to occurred several years earlier, the jury was instructed as to condonation and under the facts of this case, we find no reversible error in this enumeration.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. J. A. Nolan, for appellant. James E. Hudson, Rupert A. Brown, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bigham v. Bigham
253 S.E.2d 91 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
249 S.E.2d 564, 242 Ga. 94, 1978 Ga. LEXIS 1107, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunter-v-hunter-ga-1978.