Hunter v. Hughes

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Hunter v. Hughes

1920 OK 3, 186 P. 484, 77 Okla. 81, 1920 Okla. LEXIS 188

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedJanuary 6, 1920

Docket10508

StatusPublished

Cited by38 cases

This text of 1920 OK 3 (Hunter v. Hughes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hunter v. Hughes, 1920 OK 3, 186 P. 484, 77 Okla. 81, 1920 Okla. LEXIS 188 (Okla. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

OWEN, C. J.

On motion to dismiss it appears there was no notice given of the intention to appeal, as provided by chapter 219, Sess. L. 1917, repealing section 5238, Rev. Laws 1910. That portion of the chapter providing:

“* * * and the party desiring to appeal shall give notice in open court, either at the time the judgment is rendered, or within ten days thereafter,, of his intention to appeal to the Supreme Court”

• — was held to be mandatory in the case of Cates v. Miles, 67 Oklahoma, 169 Pac. 888, and under the authority of that case the motion to dismiss must be sustained.

The motion is therefore sustained, and the appeal dismissed.

RAINEY, PITCHFORD, JOHNSON, MC-NEILL and HIGGINS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI