Hunter v. . Hill

3 N.C. 223
CourtSuperior Court of North Carolina
DecidedJuly 5, 1802
StatusPublished

This text of 3 N.C. 223 (Hunter v. . Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hunter v. . Hill, 3 N.C. 223 (N.C. Ct. App. 1802).

Opinion

The act directs a sci. fa., and it must be followed — meaning the act of 1777, ch. 2, sec. 18.

Judgment for defendant.

NOTE. — See 1 Rev. Stat., ch. 10; Swepson v. Whitaker, 2 N.C. 224;Governor v. Jones, 9 N.C. 359; Barker v. Munroe, 15 N.C. 412; Trayv. Williamson, 18 N.C. 252.

Cited: Summers v. Parker, 4 N.C. 581, 583.

(224)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Swepson v. . Whitaker
2 N.C. 224 (Superior Court of North Carolina, 1795)
Governor Ex Rel. Arundell v. Jones
9 N.C. 359 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1823)
Troy v. . Williamson
18 N.C. 252 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1835)
Governor Ex Rel. Barker v. Munroe
15 N.C. 412 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1834)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 N.C. 223, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunter-v-hill-ncsuperct-1802.