Home/Superior Court of North Carolina/Hunter v. . Hill

Hunter v. . Hill

3 N.C. 223
Superior Court of North Carolina·Decided July 5, 1802·Published

Opinion

The act directs a sci. fa., and it must be followed — meaning the act of 1777, ch. 2, sec. 18.

Judgment for defendant.

NOTE. — See 1 Rev. Stat., ch. 10; Swepson v. Whitaker, 2 N.C. 224;Governor v. Jones, 9 N.C. 359; Barker v. Munroe, 15 N.C. 412; Trayv. Williamson, 18 N.C. 252.

Cited: Summers v. Parker, 4 N.C. 581, 583.

(224)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hunter v. . Hill, 3 N.C. 223 (N.C. Ct. App. 1802).

3 N.C. 223 (Hunter v. . Hill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Swepson v. . Whitaker
2 N.C. 224 (Superior Court of North Carolina, 1795)
Governor Ex Rel. Arundell v. Jones
9 N.C. 359 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1823)
Troy v. . Williamson
18 N.C. 252 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1835)
Governor Ex Rel. Barker v. Munroe
15 N.C. 412 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1834)