Hunter v. Higgs

503 F. App'x 215
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 7, 2013
DocketNo. 12-2046
StatusPublished

This text of 503 F. App'x 215 (Hunter v. Higgs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hunter v. Higgs, 503 F. App'x 215 (4th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

[216]*216Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Chase Carmen Hunter appeals the district court’s order denying her motion to appoint counsel. Our review of the record reveals that we previously considered Hunter’s arguments and affirmed the district court’s order. Hunter v. Higgs, 479 Fed.Appx. 470 (4th Cir.2012) (No. 12-1971). Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss this appeal as duplicative. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hunter v. Higgs
479 F. App'x 470 (Fourth Circuit, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
503 F. App'x 215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunter-v-higgs-ca4-2013.