Hunter v. Florida Parole Commission
772 So. 2d 577, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 15173, 2000 WL 1724958
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 21, 2000·No. No. 1D00-1234·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
In reviewing this case in accordance with Sheley v. Florida Parole Commission, 703 So.2d 1202 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997) (criminal division en banc), approved, 720 So.2d 216 (Fla.1998), we conclude that the circuit court afforded petitioner due process and properly denied the petition for writ of mandamus, because it failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief requested or an indisputable legal duty on the part of the commission. The petition for writ of certiorari is therefore
DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hunter v. Florida Parole Commission, 772 So. 2d 577, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 15173, 2000 WL 1724958 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
772 So. 2d 577 (Hunter v. Florida Parole Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Perez v. State
772 So. 2d 577 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)