Hunter v. First Union Home Equity Bank

759 N.E.2d 784, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1406, 2001 Ohio LEXIS 3269
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 19, 2001·No. 01-1876·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Certified State Law Question, Nos. 01CV7219 and 01CV7220. On review of preliminary memoranda pursuant to S.Ct.Prae.R. XVIII(6). The following questions were certified to the court by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Western Division:

“(1) Did the inclusion of section 5301.234 in House Bill No. 163 of the 123rd General Assembly violate the single subject clause of Art. II, § 15(D) of the Ohio Constitution?

“(2) Did the adoption of section 5301.234 violate Art. TV, § 5(B) of the Ohio Constitution?”

The court declines to answer the certified questions. This cause is therefore dismissed.

Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., Douglas and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hunter v. First Union Home Equity Bank, 759 N.E.2d 784, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1406, 2001 Ohio LEXIS 3269 (Ohio 2001).

759 N.E.2d 784 (Hunter v. First Union Home Equity Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related