Hunter v. East Rochester Union Free School District
This text of 286 A.D.2d 982 (Hunter v. East Rochester Union Free School District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in ordering a new trial on all damages where, as here, the only challenge was to the excessiveness of the award for future medical expenses. The issue of damages for future medical expenses “is not so intertwined with the other segments of the verdict that a new trial is required on all [damages]” (Diglio v Gray Dorchester Assocs., 255 AD2d 911, 912). We therefore modify the order by reinstating the verdict with respect to the remaining awards of damages and by providing that a new trial is granted on damages for future medical expenses only. Because plaintiffs failed to perfect their appeal, we do not consider any issues raised therein. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Affronti, J. — New Trial.) Present — Pine, J. P., Hayes, Hurlbutt, Burns and Gorski, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
286 A.D.2d 982, 730 N.Y.S.2d 764, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8901, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunter-v-east-rochester-union-free-school-district-nyappdiv-2001.