Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Hunter v. Department of Financial Services

Hunter v. Department of Financial Services

111 So. 3d 992, 2013 WL 1859168, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 7283
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 6, 2013
DocketNo. 1D12-5889
StatusPublished

This text of 111 So. 3d 992 (Hunter v. Department of Financial Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hunter v. Department of Financial Services, 111 So. 3d 992, 2013 WL 1859168, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 7283 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner seeks review of an Emergency Suspension Order (ESO) suspending her non-resident insurance license. We find that the ESO fails to meet the exacting standards of section 120.60(6), Florida Statutes, because it does not contain particularized facts demonstrating an immediate danger to the public health, safety, or welfare. See Kaplan v. State, Dep’t of Health, 45 So.3d 19 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010); Bio-Med Plus, Inc. v. State, Dep’t of Health, 915 So.2d 669 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005). We GRANT the petition and QUASH the ESO to the extent that it has not been mooted by the underlying administrative proceedings.

PADOVANO, ROBERTS, and CLARK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bio-Med Plus v. STATE, DEPT. OF HEALTH
915 So. 2d 669 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Kaplan v. State, Department of Health
45 So. 3d 19 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
111 So. 3d 992, 2013 WL 1859168, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 7283, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunter-v-department-of-financial-services-fladistctapp-2013.