Hunter v. Danos & Curole Marine Contractors, L.L.C.
This text of 71 F. App'x 348 (Hunter v. Danos & Curole Marine Contractors, L.L.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Bennie E. Hunter (Hunter) appeals from the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Exxon Mobil Corporation (Exxon). Hunter alleges that Exxon is liable for his injuries sustained while working on an offshore drilling platform that is owned in part and operated by Exxon. Hunter was employed by an independent contractor hired by Exxon to perform ongoing maintenance work on the drilling platform.
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no error. Exxon did not control the activity in which Hunter was engaged when he was injured. See Redinger v. Living, Inc., 689 S.W.2d 415, 418 (Tex.1985). Hunter’s accident was not caused by Exxon’s negligence or hidden premises defects on the Hoover-Diana platform. See Shell Chem. Co. v. Lamb, 493 S.W.2d 742, 746-47 (Tex.1973). Consequently, Exxon is not liable for Hunter’s injuries as a matter of law. See Thomas v. Internorth, Inc., 790 F.2d 1253, 1255 (5th Cir.1986).
AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
71 F. App'x 348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunter-v-danos-curole-marine-contractors-llc-ca5-2003.