Hunter v. Cunningham

621 F. App'x 255
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 5, 2015
DocketNo. 15-1145
StatusPublished

This text of 621 F. App'x 255 (Hunter v. Cunningham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hunter v. Cunningham, 621 F. App'x 255 (4th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Chase Carmen Hunter appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hunter v. Cunningham, No. 3:14-cv-00704-HEH (E.D.Va. Jan. 5, 2015). We also deny her motion seeking mandamus relief and other pending motions, including her motions to electronically file her submissions, proceed in forma pauperis, and correct the docket. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Proceedings in forma pauperis
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
621 F. App'x 255, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunter-v-cunningham-ca4-2015.