Hunter v. Consolidated Traction Co.
This text of 44 A. 578 (Hunter v. Consolidated Traction Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It seems to us that the learned court below submitted the question of the defendant’s negligence to the jury with careful and correct instructions. The jury found that there was no negligence and therefore rendered their verdict in favor of the defendant. It was their special function to determine this question, and an examination of the testimony convinces us that the verdict was fully justified. We do not think that the [562]*562charge is amenable to the criticisms contained in the assignments of error. We perceive no errors in the charge and the assignments of error are therefore dismissed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
44 A. 578, 193 Pa. 557, 1899 Pa. LEXIS 1165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunter-v-consolidated-traction-co-pa-1899.