Hunter v. Commissioner

684 F. App'x 650
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMarch 21, 2017
Docket16-70308
StatusUnpublished

This text of 684 F. App'x 650 (Hunter v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hunter v. Commissioner, 684 F. App'x 650 (9th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Andrew M. Hunter and Angela A. Hunter appeal from the Tax Court’s order dismissing for lack of jurisdiction their action related to their tax liability for tax years 2012 and 2013. We have jurisdiction under 26 U.S.C. § 7482(a). We review de novo, Gorospe v. Comm’r, 451 F.3d 966, 968 (9th Cir. 2006), and we affirm.

The Tax Court properly concluded that it lacked jurisdiction over the petition because the petition was not filed within 90 days of the notice of deficiency. See 26 U.S.C. § 6213(a) (establishing a 90-day requirement for appealing a notice of deficiency); 26 U.S.C. § 7502(a)(2) (timely mailing treated as timely filing “only if ... deposited in the mail in the United States in an envelope ... properly addressed to the agency ... ”); Gorospe, 451 F.3d at 968 (the Tax Court is a court of limited jurisdiction, and its subject matter is determined by Title 26 of the United States Code).

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
684 F. App'x 650, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunter-v-commissioner-ca9-2017.