Hunter v. City of Dayton

891 N.E.2d 341, 119 Ohio St. 3d 35
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 17, 2008
DocketNos. 2007-0815 and 2007-0816
StatusPublished

This text of 891 N.E.2d 341 (Hunter v. City of Dayton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hunter v. City of Dayton, 891 N.E.2d 341, 119 Ohio St. 3d 35 (Ohio 2008).

Opinion

{¶ 1} The certified question is answered in the affirmative, and the judgment of the court of appeals is reversed and judgment is entered in favor of appellant, on the authority of Rogers v. Dayton, 118 Ohio St.3d 299, 2008-Ohio-2336, 888 N.E.2d 1081.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Lanzinger, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rogers v. City of Dayton
888 N.E.2d 1081 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
891 N.E.2d 341, 119 Ohio St. 3d 35, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunter-v-city-of-dayton-ohio-2008.