Hunter v. City of Dayton

891 N.E.2d 341, 119 Ohio St. 3d 35
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided July 17, 2008·No. Nos. 2007-0815 and 2007-0816·Published

Opinion

{¶ 1} The certified question is answered in the affirmative, and the judgment of the court of appeals is reversed and judgment is entered in favor of appellant, on the authority of Rogers v. Dayton, 118 Ohio St.3d 299, 2008-Ohio-2336, 888 N.E.2d 1081.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Lanzinger, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hunter v. City of Dayton, 891 N.E.2d 341, 119 Ohio St. 3d 35 (Ohio 2008).

891 N.E.2d 341 (Hunter v. City of Dayton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rogers v. City of Dayton
888 N.E.2d 1081 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2008)