Hunter v. City of Blue Ridge

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Hunter v. City of Blue Ridge

54 S.E.2d 510, 79 Ga. App. 719, 1949 Ga. App. LEXIS 730

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 16, 1949

Docket32545.

StatusPublished

This text of 54 S.E.2d 510 (Hunter v. City of Blue Ridge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hunter v. City of Blue Ridge, 54 S.E.2d 510, 79 Ga. App. 719, 1949 Ga. App. LEXIS 730 (Ga. Ct. App. 1949).

Pincite

Opinion

MacIntyre, P. J.

It is essential to the validity of a petition for certiorari that, as provided by Code § 19-210, “All certiorari proceedings shall be filed in the clerk’s office within 10 days from the date of their sanction.” It is the actual filing of the petition in the clerk’s office which gives it validity, but it cannot have any validity as such unless it is actually filed with the custodian upon whom the law casts the duty of receiving it. Hilt v. Young, 116 Ga. 708 (43 S. E. 76). “There is only one way in which to file a paper in the superior court and that is by depositing it with the clerk, who is the legal custodian of the paper. New England Mortgage Co. v. Collins, 115 Ga. 104 [41 S. E. 270].” Ibid. “While it is not indispensably necessary that the clerk endorse ‘filed’ on the petition for certiorari” when it is delivered to him (Harlow v. Rosser, Scurry &c. Co., 28 Ca. 219), it is not filed unless delivered to him to be filed. Brinson v. Georgia R. Bank &c. Co., 45 Ga. App. 459 (165 S. E. 321). Thus, where one presents his petition for certiorari to the judge of the superior court on February 23, complaining of an adverse decision of the Mayor’s Court of the City of Blue Ridge, rendered on February 21, and the judge on that day sanctions the petition, and the writ of certiorari issues, and on the following day the entire record is delivered to the defendant in certiorari and not returned to the office of the clerk of the superior court until April 9, when it is marked filed, the petition is a mere nullity as not having been filed within the time prescribed by law'—as the court was authorized to find from the testimony of the clerk of the superior court “that he had no recollection of ever seeing the petition for certiorari before the day it was marked filed.” Peterson v. Taylor, 15 Ga. 483 (60 Am. D. 705). The superior court did not err in dismissing the petition for certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Gardner and Townsend, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MacIntyre, P. J.

It is essential to the validity of a petition for certiorari that, as provided by Code § 19-210, “All certiorari proceedings shall be filed in the clerk’s office within 10 days from the date of their sanction.” It is the actual filing of the petition in the clerk’s office which gives it validity, but it cannot have any validity as such unless it is actually filed with the custodian upon whom the law casts the duty of receiving it. Hilt v. Young, 116 Ga. 708 (43 S. E. 76). “There is only one way in which to file a paper in the superior court and that is by depositing it with the clerk, who is the legal custodian of the paper. New England Mortgage Co. v. Collins, 115 Ga. 104 [41 S. E. 270].” Ibid. “While it is not indispensably necessary that the clerk endorse ‘filed’ on the petition for certiorari” when it is delivered to him (Harlow v. Rosser, Scurry &c. Co., 28 Ca. 219), it is not filed unless delivered to him to be filed. Brinson v. Georgia R. Bank &c. Co., 45 Ga. App. 459 (165 S. E. 321). Thus, where one presents his petition for certiorari to the judge of the superior court on February 23, complaining of an adverse decision of the Mayor’s Court of the City of Blue Ridge, rendered on February 21, and the judge on that day sanctions the petition, and the writ of certiorari issues, and on the following day the entire record is delivered to the defendant in certiorari and not returned to the office of the clerk of the superior court until April 9, when it is marked filed, the petition is a mere nullity as not having been filed within the time prescribed by law'—as the court was authorized to find from the testimony of the clerk of the superior court “that he had no recollection of ever seeing the petition for certiorari before the day it was marked filed.” Peterson v. Taylor, 15 Ga. 483 (60 Am. D. 705). The superior court did not err in dismissing the petition for certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Gardner and Townsend, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 S.E.2d 510, 79 Ga. App. 719, 1949 Ga. App. LEXIS 730, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunter-v-city-of-blue-ridge-gactapp-1949.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack