Hunter v. Chase Brass & Copper Co.
This text of 271 A.2d 327 (Hunter v. Chase Brass & Copper Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There is nothing in the record to support the claim of the plaintiff that the trial court erred in its conclusion that there was no abuse of discretion on the part of the commissioner in refusing to open and modify the finding and award which had been entered by stipulation of the parties. Meadow v. Winchester Repeating Arms Co., 134 Conn. 269, 57 A.2d 138.
There is no error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
271 A.2d 327, 160 Conn. 550, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunter-v-chase-brass-copper-co-conn-1970.