Hunter v. Bell

14 La. Ann. 142
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedFebruary 15, 1859
StatusPublished

This text of 14 La. Ann. 142 (Hunter v. Bell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hunter v. Bell, 14 La. Ann. 142 (La. 1859).

Opinion

Buohanas, O'.

This is an appeal by.the Sheriff of the parish of Orleans, tfrom a judgment condemning him in damages for seizing the ship St. Peter, un■der a fieri facias issued upon a judgment, which gave a privilege upon the ship :St. Peter.

This case cannot be distinguished in principle from that of Elmore v. Hufty, 13 Am. 227.

The appellee’s counsel contends that the privilege was lost by the lapse of sixity days between the judgment allowing the privilege, and the levying of the fi. .fa.

The prescription of sixty days against privileges upon ships and vessels, recog-mizeS by many decisions, has reference to the time of asserting the privilege by ¡suit. Wo have been referred to no authority for the doctrine maintained by ap-ipellee. The right of privilege is fixed by the judgment.

It 5s, therefore, adjudged and decreed, that as regards the appellant, John M. ¿Bell, the judgment of the court below be reversed, and that there be judgment in favor of said Bdl, and against plaintiffs and appellees, with costs in both courts.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 La. Ann. 142, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunter-v-bell-la-1859.