Hunter v. Baash-Ross Tool Co.

Supreme Court

Hunter v. Baash-Ross Tool Co.

280 U.S. 531, 50 S. Ct. 158

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJanuary 13, 1930

DocketNo. 545

StatusPublished

This text of 280 U.S. 531 (Hunter v. Baash-Ross Tool Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hunter v. Baash-Ross Tool Co., 280 U.S. 531, 50 S. Ct. 158 (1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis is denied, for the reason that the Court, upon examination of the unprinted record herein submitted, finds that there is no properly presented substantial federal question. The petition for writ of certiorari is therefore also denied. The costs already incurred herein shall be paid by the Clerk as provided in the order of October 29, 1926.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis is denied, for the reason that the Court, upon examination of the unprinted record herein submitted, finds that there is no properly presented substantial federal question. The petition for writ of certiorari is therefore also denied. The costs already incurred herein shall be paid by the Clerk as provided in the order of October 29, 1926.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

280 U.S. 531, 50 S. Ct. 158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunter-v-baash-ross-tool-co-scotus-1930.