Hunter v. American Trust Co.

59 S.E.2d 213, 232 N.C. 69, 1950 N.C. LEXIS 399
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMay 3, 1950
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 59 S.E.2d 213 (Hunter v. American Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hunter v. American Trust Co., 59 S.E.2d 213, 232 N.C. 69, 1950 N.C. LEXIS 399 (N.C. 1950).

Opinion

EeviN, J.

The trial court rightly ruled that the infant, Frances Anne Thomson, and the unborn child or children of the plaintiff, Nina Hunter Thomson, have no interest whatever in the estate of Baxter Ross Hunter. The judgment finds full support in decisions upholding family settlements. Bohannon v. Trotman, 214 N.C. 706, 200 S.E. 852; Trust Co. v. [70]*70Wade, 211 N.C. 27, 188 S.E. 611; Reynolds v. Reynolds, 208 N.C. 578, 182 S.E. 341; Spencer v. McCleneghan, 202 N.C. 662, 163 S.E. 753; Tise v. Hicks, 191 N.C. 609, 132 S.E. 560; Bailey v. Wilson, 21 N.C. 182.

Moreover, it is proper even apart from the doctrine of family settlements ; for it appears that the contract was made in good faith to settle a dispute between the parties as to the validity of the will of the testator; that all persons having any interest in the estate are parties to the contract; and that all of such persons are sui juris. 57 Am. Jur., Wills, section 995. For these reasons, the judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sigmund Sternberger Foundation, Inc. v. Tannenbaum
161 S.E.2d 116 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1968)
Wagner v. Honbaier
103 S.E.2d 474 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
59 S.E.2d 213, 232 N.C. 69, 1950 N.C. LEXIS 399, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunter-v-american-trust-co-nc-1950.